BIOLOGICAL TERRAIN VS THE GERM THEORY
The germ – or microbian - theory of disease was popularized by Louis Pasteur (1822-1895), the inventor of pasteurization. This theory says that there are fixed, external germs (or microbes) which invade the body and cause a variety of separate, definable diseases. In order to get well, you need to identify and then kill whatever germ made you sick. The tools generally employed are drugs, surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. Prevention includes the use of vaccines as well as drugs, which - theoretically at least - work by keeping germs at bay.
Just prior to the time that Pasteur began promoting the “monomorphic” germ theory, a contemporary by the name of Claude Bernard (1813-1878) was developing the theory that the body's ability to heal was dependent on its general condition or internal environment. Thus disease occurred only when the terrain or internal environment of the body became favorable to disease.
brilliant contemporary of Claude Bernard's was
(1816-1908). Bechamp had degrees in physics, chemistry and
biology. In addition
he was a medical doctor and a university professor. Bechamp built upon
extended Bernard's idea, developing his own theory of health and
revolved around the concept of “pleomorphism.”
Through meticulous research and in contrast to Pasteur's subsequent, misinformed promotion of "monomorphic" or single-formed, fixed state microbes (or germs), Bechamp had discovered tiny organisms (or microorganisms) he called “microzyma” which were “pleomorphic” or “many-formed.” (Pleo = many and morph = form.) Interestingly, these microzyma were found to be present in all things whether living or dead, and they persist even when the host has died. Many were impervious to heat as well.
Bechamp’s microzyma, including specific bacteria, could take on a number of forms during the host’s life cycle and these forms depended (as Bernard contended) primarily on the chemistry of their environment, or the biological terrain, or to put it a third way, the condition of the host. In other words there is no single cause of disease. Instead disease results when microzyma change form, function and toxicity according to the terrain of the host. Bad bacteria, viruses and fungi are merely the forms assumed by the microzymas when there is a condition or terrain that favors disease and these "bad" microzyma themselves give off toxic byproducts, further contributing to a weakened terrain.
This is how Bechamp himself put it in his last book The Third Element of the Blood: ". . . the microzyma, whatever its origin, is a ferment; it is organized, it is living, capable of multiplying, of becoming diseased and of communicating disease. . . All mycrozyma are ferments of the same order - that is to say, they are organisms, able to produce alcohol, acetic acid, lactic acid and butyric acid. . . In a state of health the microzymas of the organism act harmoniously, and our life is, in every meaning of the word, a regular fermentation. In a state of disease, the microzymas do not act harmoniously, and the fermentation is disturbed; the mycrozymas have either changed their function or are placed in an abnormal situation by some modification of the medium. . ."
research, Bechamp showed
that the essence of life is a
process of digestion, assimilation, disassimilation and excretion.
in any of these functions would result in a lack of energy, full blown
or even death. Rather than causing
disease, Bechamp showed that harmful mycrozyma – which Pasteur took to
external germs attacking a host - actually arises when the body's
normal metabolic processes - or "fermentations" - are disturbed.
Thus, according to Bernard, Bechamp and their successors, disease occurs to a large extent as a function of biology and as a result of the changes that take place when metabolic processes are thrown off. Germs become symptoms that stimulate the occurrence of more symptoms - which ultimately culminate in disease. A body thus weakend also naturally becomes vulnerable to external harmful microzyma - or if you prefer pleomorphic germs. So, our bodies are in effect mini-ecosystems, or biological terrains in which nutritional status, level of toxicity and PH or acid/alkaline balance play key roles.
For these and other reasons Bechamp argued strenuously against vaccines, asserting that "The most serious disorders may be provoked by the injection of living organisms into the blood." Untold numbers of researchers have agreed with him. Nonetheless Pasteur and his like-minded contemporary Robert Koch - both being shameless self-promoters - easily won the propaganda war favoring the widespread use of vaccines - which then made boatloads of money for everyone associated. In fact, according to researcher E. Douglas Hume, if it had not been for mass acceptance of vaccines, the germ theory might very well have died a quiet death.
researchers tried to expose the fact
that Pasteur liberally "borrowed", plagiarized and
the work of others, especially that of Bechamp - which is how Pasteur
with the “germ” theory. The efforts of these researchers unfortunately
have had little effect on the practice of medicine or the way we think
Instead, as Dr. Bernard Jensen and Mark Anderson assert in their book Empty Harvest, "The germ theory is still believed to be the central cause of disease because around it exists a colossal supportive infrastructure of commercial interests that built multi-billion-dollar industries based upon this theory. To the scientific satisfaction of many in the health field, it has long been disproven as the primary cause of disease. Germs are, rather, an effect of disease."
Interestingly and to this day, the whole theory of microzymas and how they operate has never been disproved - or proven false - by opposing research. To the contrary, decades of research – beginning with Pasteur himself - has only served to bolster the mycrozyma theory. Not only does the germ theory remain unsubstantiated today, but Pasteur himself recanted it in his private journal, writing the famous words which were revealed many decades after his death:
“It is not the germ that causes disease but the terrain in which the germ is found.”
link to Bechamp or Pasteur? and
the link below to The Blood
and Its Third Element takes you to a small independent
who is providing sample chapters plus lots of related and very
important informational articles.
Please consider supporting this publisher through the purchase of these
In Bechamp or Pasteur? there is a description of Robert Koch, who was a contemporary of Pasteur's and who developed his own germ theory "postulates" - themselves never proven, which are nonetheless still taught in medical schools today. Bechamp also defends himself against the shenanigans of Pasteur and allies in the last book he wrote called The Blood and Its Third Element.
you want a thumbnail sketch of basic facts, check here, here, here and here - but
know that you may experience "cognitive dissonance" due to the hype and
propaganda surrounding this extremely lucrative and deadly serious
issue. If said "cognitive dissonance" occurs PLEASE make every effort
to continue evaluating the facts as they are, not as you would like
them to be or as you now believe them to be. You owe it to yourself and
Contemporary Books to read include the following, and please do help support this website by using our links to purchase these at Amazon:
Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective? by Neil Z. Miller
The Sanctity of Human Blood 7th edition, by Dr. Tim O'Shea
What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Children's Vaccinations by Debbie Bookchin and Jim Schumacker
The Virus and the Vaccine by Debbie Bookchin and Jim Schumacker
For information about how vaccines CAUSED the 1918 pandemic, start with a single chapter of this out-of-print online 1972 book written by a PhD. Then read this online book, published in 1920, complete with photos and statements from MDs.
for short list of MDs voicing their
opposition to vaccines:
- Website of Mayer Eisenstein (MD) of Chicago: The main page of the website has a two part clip of an old 60 Minutes report about the 1976 debacle, plus links to similar minded MDs and holistics. Eisenstein also has an archived seminar on How to Write a Valid Waiver for Vaccines.
- Youtube clip
of lecture by Rebbecca Carely, MD. This link is to the 3rd of 15 clips
of a recent lecture organized by a team of chiropractors and held in
Lombard Illinois. When you have time you might want to watch all 15
by Karen R. Effrem, MD regarding the 2005
legislation to absolve vaccine makers of any liability due to vaccine
injury (or of course death). Included at bottom of page are some good
- Article by F Edward Yazbak, MD about safety - or rather lack thereof - of flu vaccines
by Dr. Kris Gaublomme, MD about the safety and efficacy of the flu
vaccine. Note that one
of the dozens of side effects the doctor has listed is Guilliane Barr.
Guilliane Barr had been identified as a prominent vaccine complication
1976 flu scare which was reported on "60 Minutes". A video clip of the
pertinent "60 Minutes" segment is available at Mayer Eisenstein's
is a longer
list of vaccination critics who also are or were MDs. Included are
links to their articles, some of which go back to 1888.
In addition is this video clip of award winning microbiologist Garth Nicholson - who taught at medical schools - speaking about bio-engineered mycoplasma that has been found to be contaminating most vaccines. Listen to what he says about medical doctors not being educated any longer on the issue. Nicholson has his own website, with a lot of scientific reports and publications available.
Emerging Viruses A VHS format video the full title of which is the same as the book Emerging Viruses (Aids, Ebola and Vaccinations) by Leonard Horowitz. This video has a 45 minute segments on vaccines.
Some Additional websites: